GOC Standard 19: Duty of Candour in Optical Practice

Building Trust Through Honesty and Transparency

  • Reputation

    No token earned yet.

    Reach 50 points to earn the Peridot (Trainee Level).

  • CPD Certificates

    Certificates

    You have CPD Certificates for 0 courses.

  • Exam Cup

    No cup earned yet.

    Average at least 80% in exams to earn the Bronze Cup.

Launch offer: Certificates are currently free when you create a free account and log in. Log in for free access

Legal and Professional Framework

Hand reaching for eyeglasses on display

Candour in the UK has both professional and legal foundations. Knowing which applies helps teams act quickly and keep records that stand up later. [1][2]

Professional duty (UK-wide)

All registrants owe a professional duty of candour under GOC Standards: be open and honest with patients when things go wrong, say sorry, and explain what will be done to put matters right. [1]

Statutory duty (England) and NHS expectations

In England, many optical providers regulated by the CQC also carry a statutory duty of candour (Regulated Activities Regulations 2014, Regulation 20). This means timely notification, a written account, and a recorded apology when moderate or greater harm was caused - or could have been. For example, if a delayed referral resulted in avoidable worsening of vision, the statutory duty would be triggered. NHS contracts typically embed similar expectations. [2][4][3]

Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland emphasise professional candour and organisational openness through national NHS policies and guidance. Contracted or accredited services are generally expected to apply the same principles: prompt notification, apology, explanation, and learning. [5][6][7]

 

Putting the duty into practice

  • Core elements: prompt verbal notification; a sincere apology; a factual explanation of what is known; proportionate investigation; written follow-up; documented learning with owners and dates. [2][1][3]
  • Practical documents: candour policy; simple decision flowchart; letter templates; incident and risk registers; investigation notes; learning log tied to governance. [2][4]

Apology and liability

Saying sorry is the right thing to do and is not, by itself, an admission of legal liability. [3][2]

Plain language such as "I am sorry this happened," paired with concrete actions, is usually clearer and more humane than legalistic wording. [3]

Thresholds, timescales and people

Patients - or, where appropriate, their representatives - should be informed as soon as practicable. Where capacity is lacking or the patient is a child, the relevant legal framework for decision-makers guides the process. Recording who was informed, when, and who will provide updates by what date supports transparency. [2][9]

Candour spans clinical care, dispensing, administrative issues, and data incidents. When third-party vendors contribute to harm, the provider remains responsible for informing patients and coordinating fixes. For example, if a glazing lab error led to incorrect lenses being dispensed, the practice would still explain the situation to the patient and arrange the remedy. Contracts that make candour expectations explicit can help partners collaborate. [2][4][8]

Proportionality

A proportionate approach helps in practice. Minor service issues may merit an explanation without a formal candour letter - for example, a short delay in appointment booking caused by a rota change. Triage tools can align the level of response to significant harm, moderate harm, and near misses, with the rationale for each decision recorded. [2][4]

Ask Dr. Aiden


Rate this page


Course tools & details Study tools, course details, quality and recommendations
Funding & COI Media Credits