Patient Assessment and History Taking

A structured case history is often the highest-yield element of clinical decision-making in optometry. It frames the differential diagnoses, determines test selection, and identifies red flags requiring immediate action. The objective is to capture accurate, relevant information without introducing bias, while keeping the process accessible for diverse patient groups.[4][1]
Core domains to cover
- Presenting complaint analysed by onset, duration, pattern, severity, laterality, triggers, and alleviating factors.[4]
- Ocular/systemic history, medication (including steroids/anticoagulants) and allergies, family history of glaucoma/AMD/retinal detachment.[6][7][8][9]
- Functional impact: driving, screen work, near tasks, night vision, diplopia, and occupation-specific demands.[9][8]
Structuring questions for clarity and inclusion
Open questions encourage unfiltered accounts.
Focused questions can then test hypotheses. It helps to avoid leading phrases that anchor prematurely to one diagnosis. Teams can confirm comprehension using teach-back and adapt language for health literacy.[5][2]
Where there are language barriers, professional interpretation is preferable to relying on relatives, and communication should still be directed to the patient. For D/deaf patients, face the patient, keep the mouth visible, and supplement with written prompts. For neurodiverse patients, reduce sensory load, use clear, literal language, and allow extra processing time.[3][2]
From history to examination plan
Translate the history into a targeted plan: what must be ruled out now, what can be deferred, and what warrants baseline measurement for future comparison. Record the patient's priorities verbatim, and agree what "success" looks like (for example, glare reduction versus acuity maximisation). Where uncertainty remains, safety-net with clear triggers for urgent review.[1][8]
References (numbered in text)
- Annex 4 Urgency of referrals table - College of Optometrists (College of Optometrists) Find (opens in a new tab)
- Shared decision making (NICE guideline NG197) - National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Find (opens in a new tab)
- Accessible Information Standard – implementation guidance (NHS England) Find (opens in a new tab)
- Value of medical history in ophthalmology: A study of diagnostic accuracy (journal article) Find (opens in a new tab)
- Jason Talevski; Anna Wong Shee; Bodil Rasmussen; Georgie Kemp; Alison Beauchamp — Teach-back: A systematic review of implementation and impacts (PLOS ONE) Find (opens in a new tab)
- Steroid-Induced Glaucoma - StatPearls (NCBI Bookshelf / StatPearls) Find (opens in a new tab)
- Perioperative Management of Anticoagulants in Ocular Surgeries (systematic review / review article, available via PubMed Central) Find (opens in a new tab)
- Glaucoma: diagnosis and management (NICE guideline NG81) - National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Find (opens in a new tab)
- Position on vision standards for driving - College of Optometrists (College of Optometrists) Find (opens in a new tab)
References are included to demonstrate that all the content in this course is rigorously evidence-based, and has been prepared using trusted and authoritative sources.
They also serve as starting points for further reading and deeper exploration at your own pace.

