Collaborating Within the Practice Team

Within a practice, safe care depends on complementary roles-optometrists, dispensing opticians (DOs), optical assistants/technicians, and reception/admin staff-working to a shared plan.
Effective collaboration means pre-tests inform hypotheses, clinician findings shape dispensing recommendations, and aftercare advice remains consistent across the team. [1][2]
Roles, scope, and mutual contribution
Optometrists lead clinical assessment, differential diagnosis, and referral decisions, while DOs translate prescriptions into safe, functional, and cosmetically acceptable appliances. Optical assistants support measurements, pre-tests, device operation, and patient education within competence, and reception teams manage patient flow, capture essential history, and execute recalls. [1][2]
- Role clarity: Publish a scope matrix that maps tasks to roles and supervision levels, and pair this with signage at benches and name badges stating role. [2]
- Information flow: Adopt brief, structured handovers (e.g., SBAR) from pre-test to clinician and from clinician to dispensing, including the patient's priorities and red flags screened. [3]
- Shared accountability: When adaptation issues arise, the practice treats them as team problems-optometrist reviews prescription validity; DO reviews fitting/position of wear; assistants confirm usage advice was understood. [1][2]
Supporting colleagues under pressure
Busy clinics often produce queuing, interruptions, and multitasking. It helps to agree rules that protect safety: clinicians avoid entering results while a patient is disclosing symptoms; reception never triages beyond protocol; assistants pause non-urgent adjustments to prioritise red-flag walk-ins. [7]
Psychological safety matters.[4][4]
Visible task boards clarify who owns which step (e.g., "awaiting OCT review - Dr A"; "collection counselling - DO B"). Teams can build redundancy by cross-training staff to cover critical handovers when a colleague is delayed.
Invite questions, thank colleagues for raising concerns, and debrief shortfalls promptly and constructively.
Collaboration is demonstrated in records: instructions to colleagues remain unambiguous ("Repeat IOP by GAT at 15:00, record method and CCT, escalate if ≥25 mmHg"). [6][5][1]
When patients observe respect between teammates, confidence in the service increases and adherence improves. [6][5]
References (numbered in text)
- Standards of practice for optometrists and dispensing opticians, General Optical Council Find (opens in a new tab)
- Delegation, College of Optometrists Find (opens in a new tab)
- Structured patient handovers - Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s: service delivery and organisation, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Find (opens in a new tab)
- Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams — Amy C. Edmondson (Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999) Find (opens in a new tab)
- Evaluating the Effect of TeamSTEPPS on Teamwork Perceptions and Patient Safety Culture among Newly Graduated Nurses — Asmaa Elwan Hassan et al. (BMC Nursing, 2024) Find (opens in a new tab)
- Do Bedside Visual Tools Improve Patient and Caregiver Satisfaction? A Systematic Review of the Literature — Anupama A Goyal et al. (Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2017) Find (opens in a new tab)
- A systematic review of the psychological literature on interruption and its patient safety implications — Simon Y W Li; Farah Magrabi; Enrico Coiera (Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011) Find (opens in a new tab)
References are included to demonstrate that all the content in this course is rigorously evidence-based, and has been prepared using trusted and authoritative sources.
They also serve as starting points for further reading and deeper exploration at your own pace.

