GOC Standard 14: Confidentiality and Privacy in Optical Practice (Level 1)

Safeguarding Patient Data and Interactions with Professional Care

  • Reputation

    No token earned yet.

    Reach 50 points to earn the Peridot (Trainee Level).

  • CPD Certificates

    Certificates

    You have CPD Certificates for 0 courses.

  • Exam Cup

    No cup earned yet.

    Average at least 80% in exams to earn the Bronze Cup.

Launch offer: Certificates are currently free when you create a free account and log in. Log in for free access

Managing Disclosures

Hand reaching for eyeglasses on display

Sometimes information sharing is both necessary and lawful; the aim is to share the minimum needed with the right person for a clear and limited purpose, and to record the legal basis so the decision is transparent if reviewed later. [1][4][5]

With consent

Explicit consent is most useful when sharing beyond direct care or where common law requires it, and it is strengthened by checking understanding, voluntariness and scope so the person knows what will be shared and with whom; a brief note of the discussion and any limits—for example, “okay to share with my GP, not employer”—keeps intentions clear. [2]

Safeguarding and serious harm

Sharing without consent is justified when there is a risk of serious harm to a child or an adult at risk. [3]

In these situations, good practice is to disclose only what is needed to protect the person, to inform the patient if it is safe and appropriate to do so, and to record both your rationale and any advice you sought so the pathway is auditable. [3][6]

  • Other lawful disclosures: these include responding to court orders, statutory notifications (for example, public health), police requests with proper authority, and sharing in the public interest to prevent or detect serious crime. [1][6]
  • Checks before disclosure: sensible steps are to verify the requester’s identity and authority, confirm the purpose for sharing, and use a secure route with receipt confirmed. [7]
 

Minimum necessary principle

In many cases a concise summary meets the need, so forwarding full records is unnecessary; unrelated details can be redacted, and it is worth remembering that metadata such as file names and email subject lines can reveal identifiers. [4][5][2]

Communicating decisions

Taking a moment to explain—where feasible—why sharing is needed and what will be shared can support trust; a short note of what was shared and to whom adds transparency, and offering routes to raise concerns or request corrections keeps the dialogue open. [6][1]

Documentation

A concise entry typically covers the legal basis (including any consent or justification), the data items shared, the recipient and method, and the safeguards applied; it also helps to record any advice taken from Caldicott leads or information-governance teams. [4][1][4]

Ask Dr. Aiden


Rate this page


Course tools & details Study tools, course details, quality and recommendations
Funding & COI Media Credits