Digital and Social Media Conduct

Online spaces feel informal but are permanent and shareable. Posts made in seconds can reach patients, employers, and regulators.[2][6]
Professionalism online
Avoid posting discriminatory remarks, offensive jokes, or comments that mock patients or colleagues.[4][2][5]
Do not share identifiable details or timing/location clues that could reveal a case.[2][3]
Keeping personal and professional profiles separate and applying privacy settings can help, but privacy should never be relied on for safety.[5][2]
Practical online habits and governance
- Safe habits: pause before posting; avoid discussing cases; decline arguments; and use approved channels for clinical discussion.[2][5]
- Governance basics: social media policy; moderation rules for practice pages; and training that shows examples of borderline content and safer alternatives.[1][3]
Why "private" groups are risky
Private groups are not safe by default. Screenshots travel. Tone that seems humorous within a group can look cruel to outsiders and harm public trust. Deleting problematic content quickly, acknowledging error if needed, and showing the change made supports recovery.[2][6]
Documentation and proportionate monitoring
Documentation should record who posted, what was removed, when, and why. Brief learning notes prevent repeat issues and provide a reference for induction. Monitoring should be proportionate and focused on brand channels rather than personal surveillance.[3][1]
References (numbered in text)
- Disclosing confidential information — General Optical Council Find (opens in a new tab)
- Using social media as a medical professional — General Medical Council Find (opens in a new tab)
- Anonymisation and pseudonymisation guidance — Information Commissioner's Office Find (opens in a new tab)
- Social media guidance — The Nursing and Midwifery Council Find (opens in a new tab)
- Social media, ethics and professionalism — British Medical Association Find (opens in a new tab)
- Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review — Tea Vukušić Rukavina; Joško Viskić; Lovela Machala Poplašen; Danko Relić; Marko Marelić; Drazen Jokic; Kristijan Sedak; Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2021 Find (opens in a new tab)
References are included to demonstrate that all the content in this course is rigorously evidence-based, and has been prepared using trusted and authoritative sources.
They also serve as starting points for further reading and deeper exploration at your own pace.

