Exam Pass Notes

Download (Word)

Core principle

Honesty and trustworthiness underpin safe, person‑centred optical care. Complete, accurate information enables valid consent, appropriate referrals, reliable costing, and public confidence. Standard 16 requires truthfulness in words, records, conduct and commercial activity.

Key takeaways

• Honesty applies to clinical findings, records, reasoning, commercial advice, complaints handling and personal conduct.
• Record who acted, what was done (and not done), when, and why - contemporaneously where possible; late additions must be time‑stamped addenda with reason and author.
• Separate clinical need from commercial offers: present clinically suitable options across price points with equal clarity and document the patient's choice and reasoning.
• Declare conflicts of interest and sponsorships openly; mitigate or step back from decisions when conflicts are material.
• Disclose cautions/convictions promptly as required by the regulator and employer; non‑disclosure compounds risk.
• Small, repeatable behaviours (callbacks kept, accurate handovers, truthful CPD) maintain trust even during pressure.

Practical communication that builds trust

Dos

• Use plain English summaries of findings, risks, benefits and alternatives.
• Say uncertainty plainly and outline how it will be checked (who, when, how).
• Safety‑net with specific symptoms, timeframes and contact details.
• Phone back when promised (even if only to say "still waiting").
• Offer options across price points neutrally and document the discussion.

Don'ts

• Don't over‑promise outcomes (vision, comfort, timelines).
• Don't use scarcity/pressure tactics ("only today") to force decisions.
• Don't disguise commercial messaging as clinical education.

Useful phrases

• "I'm not certain yet - here's what we will check and by when."
• "I need to correct something in the record. I'll explain what changed and why."
• "There are three clinically suitable options; here are their likely benefits and drawbacks."

Records & documentation - what makes notes defensible

Essential elements for every clinical entry

• Who (name/role) made the record or decision.
• What was done and what was not done.
• When it happened (date/time).
• Why the decision served the patient's interest (rationale).
• Safety‑netting and planned review (who will do what, and by when).

Minimal entry checklist for borderline/defensible notes

• Presenting problem and patient priorities.
• Key positives and negatives that guided the decision.
• Decision and alternatives considered.
• Safety‑net instructions (signs to watch, timescales, contact).
• Responsible person and planned review date.

Addenda practice

• Late entries must be addenda with date/time, author and reason.
• Record device outputs or attach them - don't paraphrase alone.
• Distinguish fact from hypothesis (use "possible"/"suspect" vs "is").

Two quick self‑checks

• "Would a reasonable colleague believe this account?"
• "Would I be comfortable reading this note aloud in a complaint meeting?"

Templates & tools

• Structured history/findings/plan templates.
• Referral templates that capture red flags and unanswered questions.
• One‑page decision logs for unusual advice.
• Conflict‑of‑interest register linked to patient encounters.

Managing clinical uncertainty & escalation

• Admit limits of competence and seek peer input on approved platforms; record who advised and when.
• Tie safety‑netting to concrete symptoms and timeframes.
• Use a second‑checker for high‑risk referrals and end‑of‑list prompts for unsigned records.
• Supervised work must be documented as supervised - don't badge as independent.

Short escalation script

• "I'm unsure about X. I will discuss this with [colleague/name] by [time] and update you with the plan. If you notice [symptom], contact us/attend A&E immediately."

Financial integrity & conflicts of interest

Principles

• Clinical recommendations follow need, not incentives or sales targets.
• Present equivalent clinical options with equal emphasis regardless of price.
• Disclose sponsorships, referral fees or product ties in plain language; log them.

Controls to implement

• Options matrix at dispensing stations.
• Written quotes and visible price lists.
• Conflict register with review dates.
• Audit parity of recommendations across patient groups.

Short transparency checklist at point of sale

• Explain costs before commitment.
• Record the patient's priorities and objective justification for atypical choices.
• Note if promotion or sponsorship influenced availability or pricing.

Personal conduct, convictions & FtP

Why it matters

• Off‑work dishonesty/illegal acts can undermine public confidence and raise fitness‑to‑practise concerns.
• Cautions and convictions are admissions of wrongdoing and must be disclosed per GOC requirements.

Disclosure steps

• Inform employer and regulator as required, promptly.
• Prepare outcome documents, a reflective statement, remediation evidence and supervisor references.
• Agree proportionate interim controls (e.g., no lone unsupervised work if aggression is relevant).

File to keep

• Who was notified and when.
• Copies of outcome documents and correspondence.
• Evidence of remediation and review dates.

Scenarios - rapid actions & reasoning (condensed)

Scenario 1: False certification claim

• Risk: misrepresentation of competence, patient harm.
• Action: correct records and profiles, inform hiring manager, adjust duties and supervision, document who was informed and why.

Scenario 2: Backdated IOPs

• Risk: misleading record, missed referral trigger.
• Action: add time‑stamped addendum stating values, method and why recorded late; contact patient if care affected; inform manager if repetitive; introduce checklist.

Scenario 3: Undisclosed sponsorship request

• Risk: covert bias in education, conflict of interest.
• Action: decline non‑disclosure; if accepted, disclose sponsorship, present balanced evidence, log decision and update register.

Scenario 4: Pressure to push premium sales

• Risk: compromised clinical neutrality.
• Action: reiterate clinical‑first policy, use options matrix and standard scripts, escalate formally if pressure persists, audit dispensing and record safeguards.

Scenario 5: Normalising petty dishonesty privately

• Risk: harms professional culture and role modelling.
• Action: stop behaviour, acknowledge to team if seen by juniors, remove offending device, document reflection and actions.

Scenario 6: Violent offence outside work

• Risk: judgement/self‑control concerns affecting FtP.
• Action: seek legal advice, inform employer/regulator as required, agree workplace safeguards and rehabilitation, document actions and review dates.

Scenario 7: Police caution for shoplifting

• Risk: admitted wrongdoing; must be disclosed.
• Action: disclose to GOC and employer, prepare reflective statement and remediation evidence, document all correspondence.

Scenario 8: Drink‑driving conviction

• Risk: impact on duties involving driving.
• Action: inform employer/regulator, review driving duties and insurance, arrange rehabilitation, document limits and review plan.

Quick reference checklists

Addendum (late entry)

• Date/time of addendum
• Author name/role
• Reason for late entry
• Exact values/observations and method
• Effect on care/action taken and who was informed

Dispensing transparency

• Confirm clinical suitability for each option
• State prices and features plainly
• Offer lower‑cost suitable alternatives alongside premiums
• Record patient choice and reasons

Conflict of interest disclosure

• Record offer details (who, when)
• State decision (accept/decline) and mitigation
• Add entry to conflicts register with review date
• Note what was declared to patients or event attendees

Daily integrity list (for practitioners)

• Identity check before phone advice
• Avoid copying forward unchecked data
• Keep callback commitments
• Use neutral language in notes
• Flag pressures early (time/commercial)

Reflection, learning & improvement

Individual reflection

• Describe a borderline interaction, identify pressures, note risks to trust.
• Choose one behaviour change plus one system tweak.
• Set a review date and owner.

Team improvement cycle (fast test)

• Identify one risk → choose one control → test 2 weeks → review data/feedback → adopt/adapt/drop.
• Record owner and next review date.

Embedding honesty in systems

• Make the honest path easy: protected admin time, fast access to approved advice platforms, obvious addendum function in PMS.
• Monthly sampling of records and parity audits.
• Thank people who self‑correct to reinforce psychological safety.

Ready phrases for difficult conversations

Explaining an error

• "I want to explain something that we have found in your care. There was an omission/mistake: this is what changed, what it means for you, and how we will reduce the risk going forward."

Admitting uncertainty

• "I'm not certain about this result. We will repeat/arrange [test] by [date], discuss findings, and I'll call you with the next steps. If you notice [specific symptom], contact us immediately."

Declaring a conflict

• "I should declare I have received funding/been offered payment by [sponsor]. I will present the full evidence and make clear this is the situation so you can judge the independence of the information."

Reporting convictions/cautions (to employer/regulator)

• "I wish to disclose a [caution/conviction] from [date]. The outcome documents are attached. I have reflected on this, completed [remediation], and propose these workplace controls: [controls]."

Apply these notes as quick checks in clinical practice, record keeping, commercial interactions and when reflecting or escalating. Small, consistent habits and simple documented controls preserve professional integrity and public confidence under pressure.