GOC Standard 15: Sexual Harassment in Optical Practice (Level 1)

Safeguarding Colleagues and Patients Through Zero-Tolerance Practice (Within S15)

  • Reputation

    No token earned yet.

    Reach 50 points to earn the Peridot (Trainee Level).

  • CPD Certificates

    Certificates

    You have CPD Certificates for 0 courses.

  • Exam Cup

    No cup earned yet.

    Average at least 80% in exams to earn the Bronze Cup.

Launch offer: Certificates are currently free when you create a free account and log in. Log in for free access

Understanding Sexual Harassment

Hand reaching for eyeglasses on display

Sexual harassment is unwanted conduct of a sexual nature that violates dignity or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive environment. In optical practice it can arise between colleagues, from patients to staff, or within mixed clinical-retail interactions where the boundary between care and commerce can blur.[1][2]

Key concepts and contexts

Under the Equality Act 2010, intent is not required; what matters is the impact on the recipient. Behaviour may be verbal, non‐verbal, physical, or digital, and a single serious incident can meet the threshold just as surely as a pattern of lower‐level acts.[1][3]

Distinguishing from consensual interaction

Harassment differs from mutual, consensual interaction where a power imbalance exists, genuine consent is doubtful, or others are exposed to conduct they did not choose to witness. "Banter" is not a defence when dignity is harmed, and the workplace context raises expectations of professionalism.[2][5]

 

Where it appears in optical work

Close working distances, dim rooms, and one‐to‐one consultations often increase risk. Mixed clinical-commercial spaces and domiciliary visits can add informality and ambiguity. Power dynamics matter: seniority, control of rotas or assessments, and clinician-patient roles frequently inhibit challenge and reporting.[4][5][8]

Practical markers to watch

  • Verbal: sexual jokes, comments on appearance, persistent invitations after refusal, or questions about private life.[2]
  • Non‐verbal/physical: staring, gestures, invading space, unnecessary touch, or blocking exits.[2]
  • Digital: explicit messages or images, and late‐night personal texts about non‐clinical matters.[2]

Why this is a safety issue

Harassment erodes psychological safety, drives staff turnover, and diverts attention from clinical tasks, which heightens incident risk through cognitive load. Patient trust also suffers when inappropriate behaviour is witnessed in public areas.[7][8]

Professional standards require respectful, safe environments.

Zero tolerance policies protect staff, patients, and the profession, and align with Standard 15 on boundaries.[4]

Documentation principles

Best practice is to keep records factual, contemporaneous, and proportionate, noting:

  • who
  • what
  • when
  • where
  • exact words (if relevant)
  • witnesses
  • immediate actions
  • escalation

Personal data is kept to the minimum necessary, stored securely, and separated so that HR files and incident logs remain distinct, with access provided on a need‐to‐know basis.[6][2][7]

Setting clear expectations

Teams benefit when leaders state boundaries explicitly and model them in day‐to‐day interactions. Induction that covers behaviour standards, chaperoning, and phrases for safely stopping an interaction helps consistency.

Temporary staff and locums receive the same rules on day one, and observers are expected to avoid contacting patients outside approved channels.[2][5]

Early, respectful challenge

Short pre-planned scripts make real‐time correction easier. "That comment is not appropriate here - let's keep it professional," is clear and calm without inviting conflict.

Where behaviour persists, it often helps to pause the interaction, seek support, and document the boundary; for patients, rebooking with another clinician and issuing behaviour letters may be appropriate where policy allows.[2]

Designing out ambiguity

Risk often reduces when chaperone signage is visible, sightlines allow observation without compromising privacy, and panic buttons are available where policy includes them. Publishing routes for anonymous reporting and guaranteeing non‐retaliation encourages early escalation.[5][2]

Accountability in governance

Useful governance practice includes tracking themes in complaints, incidents, and exit interviews, then reviewing training impact, rota patterns, and high‐risk zones. Clear ownership and dates for improvements-with visible checks on completion-signal that concerns lead to change.[3][2]

Ask Dr. Aiden


Rate this page


Course tools & details Study tools, course details, quality and recommendations
Funding & COI Media Credits